Jay Narayan Sah alias Tetar Sah vs State of Bihar and Others Advocate - Krishna Murari Prasad — 9/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS NON MAINTAINABLE on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRSH010005482026

Filing Number

537/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Saharsa

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS NON MAINTAINABLE

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jay Narayan Sah alias Tetar Sah

    Adv. MAHENDRA NARAYAN CHOUDHARY

  2. 2.Wakil Sah

  3. 3.Khusilal Sah

  4. 4.Raja Sah

  5. 5.Chhotu Sah

  6. 6.Kushum Lal Sah

  7. 7.Birendra Sah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar and Others Advocate - Krishna Murari Prasad

  2. 2.Murari Pd Gupta

  3. 3.Ratan Kumar

  4. 4.Dinesh Sah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Revision No. 9/2026 The court dismissed the revision petition as unmaintainable, holding that the show-cause notice issued by the Executive Magistrate under Section 126 BNSS was purely interlocutory and non-adjudicatory in nature, falling within the bar of Section 397(2) Cr.PC/438(2) BNSS against revision of interlocutory orders. The court directed the petitioners to appear before the Executive Magistrate and file detailed replies raising legal and factual objections, clarifying that if the Magistrate arbitrarily proceeds despite valid cause being shown, the petitioners may then approach the revisional court as the bar would no longer apply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Addmission

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Revision No. 9/2026 The court dismissed the revision petition as unmaintainable, holding that the show-cause notice issued by the Executive Magistrate under Section 126 BNSS was purely interlocutory and non-adjudicatory in nature, falling within the bar of Section 397(2) Cr.PC/438(2) BNSS against revision of interlocutory orders. The court directed the petitioners to appear before the Executive Magistrate and file detailed replies raising legal and factual objections, clarifying that if the Magistrate arbitrarily proceeds despite valid cause being shown, the petitioners may then approach the revisional court as the bar would no longer apply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case