GHURAN MAHTO vs GAJENDRA PRASAD YADAV Advocate - RAMANANAD SINGH — 1663/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 14/148/149/341/342/323/337/332/353/307/452. Disposed: Contested--CONVICT on 17th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRSH010000122005
Filing Number
1673/2014
Filing Date
17-02-2005
Registration No
1663/2014
Registration Date
17-02-2005
Court
DJ Div. Saharsa
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICT
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
SAHARSA SADAR
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GHURAN MAHTO
Adv. ANIL TAHKUR
Respondent(s)
GAJENDRA PRASAD YADAV Advocate - RAMANANAD SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
Hearing on sentence
Restored
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing on sentence |
| 12-03-2026 | Restored |
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 1663/2014 (Ghuran Mahto v. Gajendra Prasad Yadav) The court acquitted the accused, Gajendra Prasad Yadav, of charges under IPC Sections 147 and 307 and SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 3(1)(x) due to insufficient evidence, but convicted him under Sections 353, 341, 323, and 337 IPC. He was sentenced to concurrent imprisonment (4 months 10 days, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months respectively) for obstructing polling officials and causing hurt during a 2005 election booth incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 1663/2014 (Ghuran Mahto v. Gajendra Prasad Yadav) The court acquitted the accused, Gajendra Prasad Yadav, of charges under IPC Sections 147 and 307 and SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 3(1)(x) due to insufficient evidence, but convicted him under Sections 353, 341, 323, and 337 IPC. He was sentenced to concurrent imprisonment (4 months 10 days, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months respectively) for obstructing polling officials and causing hurt during a 2005 election booth incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts