SANGEETA KUER vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 484/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.

Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100015792025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-12-2025

Filing Number

1799/2025

Filing Date

20-12-2025

Registration No

484/2025

Registration Date

20-12-2025

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

821

Police Station

BIKRAM GANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5),61(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

SANGEETA KUER

Adv. Prasoon Shankar

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

02-04-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

ORDER

16-03-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

18-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Rejected

Case 484/2025 Summary: The court rejected Sangeeta Kuer's bail application in a murder case involving the death of Akhilesh Rai on 07.12.2025. The court found prima facie evidence supporting the prosecution case based on witness statements and case diary records showing grievous injuries to vital body parts and death caused by firearm injury, which demonstrated the requisite criminal intent under Section 103 BNS 2023. Given the gravity of the offence and the antemortem injuries, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 484/2025 Summary: The court rejected Sangeeta Kuer's bail application in a murder case involving the death of Akhilesh Rai on 07.12.2025. The court found prima facie evidence supporting the prosecution case based on witness statements and case diary records showing grievous injuries to vital body parts and death caused by firearm injury, which demonstrated the requisite criminal intent under Section 103 BNS 2023. Given the gravity of the offence and the antemortem injuries, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Bikramganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case