RAHUL KUMAR SINGH vs STATE OF BIHARANA AND OTHERS — 800/2025
Case under --- Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO100015772025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
1797/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
800/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Bikramganj
Judge
14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
535
Police Station
DINARA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHUL KUMAR SINGH
-
2.CHANDAN KUMAR alias CHANDAN KUMAR SINGH
Adv. SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHARANA AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
allowed
The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Rahul Kumar Singh and Chandan Kumar Singh in a case involving charges under BNS 2023 sections for alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, noted the case stemmed from an admitted land dispute, and observed that other co-accused had already been granted bail, outweighing the prosecution's concern about one prior criminal case. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, subject to cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 800/2025
The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Rahul Kumar Singh and Chandan Kumar Singh in a case involving charges under BNS 2023 sections for alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, noted the case stemmed from an admitted land dispute, and observed that other co-accused had already been granted bail, outweighing the prosecution's concern about one prior criminal case. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, subject to cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts