OM KUMAR vs USH DEVI — 787/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100015392025

e-Filing Number

10-12-2025

Filing Number

1770/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

787/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

206

Police Station

SANJHAULI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),140(3)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OM KUMAR

  2. 2.VISWANATH CHOUDHARY

    Adv. Deepak Kumar

  3. 3.USHA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.USH DEVI

  2. 2.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court, Bikramganj dismissed the interim bail application (No. 787/2025) filed by the accused (Om Kumar, Vishwanath Chaudhary, and Usha Devi) on the basis of withdrawal. The court allowed the application for withdrawal as requested by the accused's counsel, and therefore disposed of the interim bail application on withdrawal grounds as per the accused's own request, with no opposition from the Public Prosecutor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 787/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court, Bikramganj dismissed the interim bail application (No. 787/2025) filed by the accused (Om Kumar, Vishwanath Chaudhary, and Usha Devi) on the basis of withdrawal. The court allowed the application for withdrawal as requested by the accused's counsel, and therefore disposed of the interim bail application on withdrawal grounds as per the accused's own request, with no opposition from the Public Prosecutor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case