SURENDRA SINGH vs STATE — 726/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAW on 05th February 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100014092025

e-Filing Number

18-11-2025

Filing Number

1673/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

726/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

05-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAW

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

338

Police Station

SURYAPURA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,238,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

  2. 2.SARASWATI DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Feb-2026

    Disposed offView PDF

    The Court of 2nd District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj, Rohtas allowed the bail petition filed by petitioners Surendra Singh, Kumar Singh, and Sarswati Devi to be withdrawn, as the petitioners no longer wished to proceed with their anticipatory bail petition. The court directed the office to communicate the order to the concerned court and deposit the case record as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 726/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of 2nd District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj, Rohtas allowed the bail petition filed by petitioners Surendra Singh, Kumar Singh, and Sarswati Devi to be withdrawn, as the petitioners no longer wished to proceed with their anticipatory bail petition. The court directed the office to communicate the order to the concerned court and deposit the case record as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case