Vikas Kumar Gupta vs State of Bihar — 663/2025

Case under --- Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100012802025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-10-2025

Filing Number

1565/2025

Filing Date

16-10-2025

Registration No

663/2025

Registration Date

16-10-2025

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

342

Police Station

NASRIGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

--- Section 482
Essential Commodities Act Section 7

Petitioner(s)

Vikas Kumar Gupta

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

21-04-2026

Disposed

15-04-2026

ORDER

08-04-2026

HEARING

04-04-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

21-04-2026
allowed
21-04-2026
allowed
21-04-2026
allowed
21-04-2026
allowed
21-04-2026
allowed

Case 663/2025 Summary: The Court of 2nd District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj, granted anticipatory bail to Vikas Kumar Gupta in an Essential Commodities Act case. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce evidence that the petitioner was duly authorized as a representative of the deceased licensee to operate the fair price shop, creating doubt over the prosecution's case. Considering the petitioner's clear antecedents and lack of criminal history, bail was allowed on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 663/2025 Summary: The Court of 2nd District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj, granted anticipatory bail to Vikas Kumar Gupta in an Essential Commodities Act case. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce evidence that the petitioner was duly authorized as a representative of the deceased licensee to operate the fair price shop, creating doubt over the prosecution's case. Considering the petitioner's clear antecedents and lack of criminal history, bail was allowed on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Bikramganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case