BITTU PATLE vs STATE — 558/2025

Case under --- Section 126(2),115(2),85,89,351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100010832025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-09-2025

Filing Number

1395/2025

Filing Date

04-09-2025

Registration No

558/2025

Registration Date

04-09-2025

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

176

Police Station

SURYAPURA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

--- Section 126(2),115(2),85,89,351(2),352,3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.P) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

BITTU PATLE

Respondent(s)

STATE

MANOJ CHAUDHARY

SURESH CHAODUAHRY

BATESRA KUWAR

INDU DEVI

AMAN PATEL

RITIK PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

27-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

ORDER

06-04-2026

HEARING

23-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
allowed

The court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused petitioners (Bittu Patel, Manoj Chaudhary, Suresh Chaudhary, Batesra Kuwar, Indu Devi, Aman Patel, and Ritik Patel) facing charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 89, 351(2), 352, and 3(5), and DP Act sections 3/4. The court found the petitioners had clean antecedents, the case involved potential misuse of provisions, parties had amicably settled the dispute, and no adverse material emerged during prosecution. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, with directions to cooperate with trial and remain present until charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused petitioners (Bittu Patel, Manoj Chaudhary, Suresh Chaudhary, Batesra Kuwar, Indu Devi, Aman Patel, and Ritik Patel) facing charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 89, 351(2), 352, and 3(5), and DP Act sections 3/4. The court found the petitioners had clean antecedents, the case involved potential misuse of provisions, parties had amicably settled the dispute, and no adverse material emerged during prosecution. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, with directions to cooperate with trial and remain present until charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Bikramganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case