BITTU PATLE vs STATE — 558/2025
Case under --- Section 126(2),115(2),85,89,351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO100010832025
e-Filing Number
04-09-2025
Filing Number
1395/2025
Filing Date
04-09-2025
Registration No
558/2025
Registration Date
04-09-2025
Court
DJ Div. Bikramganj
Judge
14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
176
Police Station
SURYAPURA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BITTU PATLE
Respondent(s)
STATE
MANOJ CHAUDHARY
SURESH CHAODUAHRY
BATESRA KUWAR
INDU DEVI
AMAN PATEL
RITIK PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-04-2026 | ORDER | |
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused petitioners (Bittu Patel, Manoj Chaudhary, Suresh Chaudhary, Batesra Kuwar, Indu Devi, Aman Patel, and Ritik Patel) facing charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 89, 351(2), 352, and 3(5), and DP Act sections 3/4. The court found the petitioners had clean antecedents, the case involved potential misuse of provisions, parties had amicably settled the dispute, and no adverse material emerged during prosecution. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, with directions to cooperate with trial and remain present until charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to seven accused petitioners (Bittu Patel, Manoj Chaudhary, Suresh Chaudhary, Batesra Kuwar, Indu Devi, Aman Patel, and Ritik Patel) facing charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 89, 351(2), 352, and 3(5), and DP Act sections 3/4. The court found the petitioners had clean antecedents, the case involved potential misuse of provisions, parties had amicably settled the dispute, and no adverse material emerged during prosecution. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, with directions to cooperate with trial and remain present until charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts