BINAY GUPTA vs State of Bihar — 360/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,3213,120B,498A,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO100006772025
e-Filing Number
18-06-2025
Filing Number
1077/2025
Filing Date
21-06-2025
Registration No
360/2025
Registration Date
21-06-2025
Court
DJ Div. Bikramganj
Judge
14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
MAHILA PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BINAY GUPTA
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
KRIPAL GUPTA ALIAS KRIPANIDHAN
DULARI KUNWER
CHINTA DEVI
PRITI DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: 14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
LOK-NYALAYA
LOK-NYALAYA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-02-2026 | LOK-NYALAYA | |
| 04-02-2026 | LOK-NYALAYA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Court of 2nd District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Kripal Gupta, Dulari Kunwar, Chinta Devi, Priti Devi, and Sonu Gupta) in a case involving allegations under IPC sections 341, 323, 120(B), 498(A), 504, 506, 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3-4. The court found the allegations omnibus in nature, noted the accused's clean criminal record, settlement efforts by the court proved unsuccessful, and applied Supreme Court guidelines from Arnesh Kumar regarding misuse of Section 498-A. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions against witness tampering and cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court of 2nd District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons (Kripal Gupta, Dulari Kunwar, Chinta Devi, Priti Devi, and Sonu Gupta) in a case involving allegations under IPC sections 341, 323, 120(B), 498(A), 504, 506, 34 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3-4. The court found the allegations omnibus in nature, noted the accused's clean criminal record, settlement efforts by the court proved unsuccessful, and applied Supreme Court guidelines from Arnesh Kumar regarding misuse of Section 498-A. The petitioners were released on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, subject to conditions against witness tampering and cooperation in trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts