RIJWAN ALIAS SINU vs STATE — 143/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100003092026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

233/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

143/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

156

Police Station

NASRIGANJ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Indian Penal Code Section 420,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RIJWAN ALIAS SINU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Rejected

    Summary of Case 143/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rijwan alias Sinu, who was accused of cheating, criminal intimidation, and related offenses under IPC sections 406, 420, 504, 506, and 34 (FIR No. 156/2024). The prosecution alleged that the accused, along with others, fraudulently solicited ₹10,00,000 from the complainant for a sand business investment, provided only ₹5,12,000, and subsequently harassed and threatened the complainant when asked for refund. Finding the charges prima facie substantial and considering the accused's prior criminal history, the court denied the anticipatory bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 143/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 143/2026 The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Rijwan alias Sinu, who was accused of cheating, criminal intimidation, and related offenses under IPC sections 406, 420, 504, 506, and 34 (FIR No. 156/2024). The prosecution alleged that the accused, along with others, fraudulently solicited ₹10,00,000 from the complainant for a sand business investment, provided only ₹5,12,000, and subsequently harassed and threatened the complainant when asked for refund. Finding the charges prima facie substantial and considering the accused's prior criminal history, the court denied the anticipatory bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case