DHARMENDRA KUMAR vs STATE — 90/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100003072026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

231/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

166

Police Station

KARAKAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,103,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARMENDRA KUMAR

    Adv. MANAS KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    RejectedView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application (Regular Bail Application No. 90/2026) of the accused Dharmendra Kumar in FIR No. 166/2025 under IPC Sections 281, 103, and 3(5), filed in connection with the death of the informant's father. The court found that the accused committed the murder in a property dispute by hitting the victim with a car, and rejected the accused's claim of being HIV-positive as insufficient ground for bail, noting that the High Court had already dismissed a similar petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application (Regular Bail Application No. 90/2026) of the accused Dharmendra Kumar in FIR No. 166/2025 under IPC Sections 281, 103, and 3(5), filed in connection with the death of the informant's father. The court found that the accused committed the murder in a property dispute by hitting the victim with a car, and rejected the accused's claim of being HIV-positive as insufficient ground for bail, noting that the High Court had already dismissed a similar petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case