SUNIL PANDIT vs STATE — 86/2026

Court Decision Summary The 2nd District & Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj rejected bail applications (BP 72/2026 and BP 86/2026) for four accused persons charged with mass-marketing fraud under BNS 2023 sections including organized crime (Sec. 111). The court found sufficient evidence supporting the prosecution's case that the accused collected funds through fraudulent investment schemes (Sarvjan Sukhaya Nidhi and Reliable Agroland) and failed to return maturity amounts to numerous victims, with witness statements corroborating the allegations. The court held that the gravity of the offense involving defrauding poor persons warranted continued custody and declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.