SIKKU KUMAR vs STATE — 106/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAW on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100002262026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

106/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAW

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

381

Police Station

NASRIGANJ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,132,74,351(2),121(1),121(2),115(2),126(2),352,109,191(2),324(4),324(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIKKU KUMAR

    Adv. ABHISHEK KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Copy of document.

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Sikku Kumar (accused) on the ground of withdrawal. The accused had already surrendered before the court on 02.03.2026 and furnished bail, rendering the anticipatory bail application infructuous. The court rejected the application as withdrawn, based on the counsel's request and lack of opposition from the Public Prosecutor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Sikku Kumar (accused) on the ground of withdrawal. The accused had already surrendered before the court on 02.03.2026 and furnished bail, rendering the anticipatory bail application infructuous. The court rejected the application as withdrawn, based on the counsel's request and lack of opposition from the Public Prosecutor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case