SONU PANDEY vs STATE — 66/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100002132026

e-Filing Number

07-02-2026

Filing Number

166/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

66/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

529

Police Station

DINARA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONU PANDEY

    Adv. Ram Naresh singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    allowed

    The court granted bail to Sonu Pandey, who was arrested in connection with a firearms offense under the Arms Act since November 26, 2025. The court found that the charge sheet had already been submitted (reducing tampering risks), the petitioner had been incarcerated for sufficient time, and the case lacked proper sanction documentation. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, effective after charge framing, with conditions requiring cooperation and court availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Sonu Pandey, who was arrested in connection with a firearms offense under the Arms Act since November 26, 2025. The court found that the charge sheet had already been submitted (reducing tampering risks), the petitioner had been incarcerated for sufficient time, and the case lacked proper sanction documentation. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, effective after charge framing, with conditions requiring cooperation and court availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case