AKASH KUMAR URF GOVIND KUMAR vs STATE — 63/2026
Case under Arms Act Section 27. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th April 2026.
Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO100002072026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
160/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bikramganj
Judge
12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
BIKRAM GANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AKASH KUMAR URF GOVIND KUMAR
Adv. AKATMA KUMAR KASHYAP
Respondent(s)
STATE
Hearing History
Judge: 12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 08-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 30-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 63/2026 Court Decision: The court granted bail to Akash Kumar (alias Govind Kumar) on the condition that he furnish bail bonds of Rs. 7,000 with two sureties, subject to the court's satisfaction. Key Reasoning: The court considered that while the petitioner is the primary accused in FIR No. 78/2025 (involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 118(1), 109, 308(3), 351, and Arms Act section 27) and has been in custody since January 20, 2026, the investigation has been completed and the chargesheet filed. The court found that there were no recoveries from his possession, and balanced the circumstances of the case to warrant his release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 63/2026 Court Decision: The court granted bail to Akash Kumar (alias Govind Kumar) on the condition that he furnish bail bonds of Rs. 7,000 with two sureties, subject to the court's satisfaction. Key Reasoning: The court considered that while the petitioner is the primary accused in FIR No. 78/2025 (involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 118(1), 109, 308(3), 351, and Arms Act section 27) and has been in custody since January 20, 2026, the investigation has been completed and the chargesheet filed. The court found that there were no recoveries from his possession, and balanced the circumstances of the case to warrant his release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts