MOHAR LAL vs STATE — 78/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO100001632026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
126/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
78/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bikramganj
Judge
12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
398
Police Station
DINARA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAR LAL
Respondent(s)
STATE
Hearing History
Judge: 12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 78/2026 The court dismissed Mohar Lal's interim bail application on 22.04.2026. Lal was arrested for illegally transporting approximately 791 CFT of stone/sand without valid documentation, causing revenue loss to Bihar government, under IPC sections 379, 411, and Bihar Mines Act sections 56(1)-(2). The court found that while Lal claimed the truck driver acted without his knowledge, his co-accused driver Satyendra Yadav was already released on bail, and Lal failed to appear before the trial court for regular bail proceedings as directed. The court directed Lal to surrender before the trial court and apply for regular bail according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 78/2026 The court dismissed Mohar Lal's interim bail application on 22.04.2026. Lal was arrested for illegally transporting approximately 791 CFT of stone/sand without valid documentation, causing revenue loss to Bihar government, under IPC sections 379, 411, and Bihar Mines Act sections 56(1)-(2). The court found that while Lal claimed the truck driver acted without his knowledge, his co-accused driver Satyendra Yadav was already released on bail, and Lal failed to appear before the trial court for regular bail proceedings as directed. The court directed Lal to surrender before the trial court and apply for regular bail according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts