HIRALAL SINGH vs SRIMATI MAHESHWARI DEVI — 7/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

TITLE APPEAL

CNR: BRRO100001372021

Filing Number

7/2021

Filing Date

15-Feb-2021

Registration No

7/2021

Registration Date

15-Feb-2021

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

14-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIRALAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SRIMATI MAHESHWARI DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Dismissed for default

    The Court of District & Additional Session Judge II, Bikramganj dismissed the appellant Hiralal Singh's suit for default. Despite repeated court calls and multiple directions, the appellant failed to appear or proceed with arguments on the scheduled date (16.03.2026), demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. The court directed the case record to be deposited in the office record room as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-II

  9. 31-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 15-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of District & Additional Session Judge II, Bikramganj dismissed the appellant Hiralal Singh's suit for default. Despite repeated court calls and multiple directions, the appellant failed to appear or proceed with arguments on the scheduled date (16.03.2026), demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. The court directed the case record to be deposited in the office record room as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case