BIRENDRA RAM vs STATE — 34/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 27. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO100001102026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

88/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Bikramganj

Judge

12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

NASRIGANJ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 27
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Indian Penal Code Section 323,307

Petitioner(s)

BIRENDRA RAM

Adv. pavan kumar singh

Respondent(s)

STATE

Hearing History

Judge: 12-District and Addl. Sessions. Judge-I

16-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

HEARING

18-02-2026

HEARING

05-02-2026

HEARING

04-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Rejected

The court rejected Birendra Ram's bail petition under Case 34/2026, arising from FIR 51/2024 involving charges under IPC Sections 393, 307, and the Arms Act Section 27. The prosecution alleged that co-accused fired at the informant (a wholesale businessman) following an attempted robbery, causing a gunshot wound to his abdomen and lower back. The court found the charges serious and concluded that releasing the accused on bail was inappropriate given the gravity of the offense and evidence including the medical report and CDR records showing pre-planned conspiracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Birendra Ram's bail petition under Case 34/2026, arising from FIR 51/2024 involving charges under IPC Sections 393, 307, and the Arms Act Section 27. The prosecution alleged that co-accused fired at the informant (a wholesale businessman) following an attempted robbery, causing a gunshot wound to his abdomen and lower back. The court found the charges serious and concluded that releasing the accused on bail was inappropriate given the gravity of the offense and evidence including the medical report and CDR records showing pre-planned conspiracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Bikramganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case