M/S. John Deere Financial India Private Limited through Kumar Ritesh vs Sunil Kumar Singh — 29/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 112(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 18th April 2026.

EXECUITION CASES

CNR: BRRO010091272025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-11-2025

Filing Number

1077/2025

Filing Date

14-11-2025

Registration No

29/2025

Registration Date

15-11-2025

Court

DJ Div. Rohtas

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 112(2)

Petitioner(s)

M/S. John Deere Financial India Private Limited through Kumar Ritesh

Adv. Pashupati Nath Dwivedi

Respondent(s)

Sunil Kumar Singh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

18-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

HEARING

30-03-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

19-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
Dismissed

Case Summary: M/S. John Deere Financial India Private Limited v. Sunil Kumar Singh The Principal District Judge dismissed John Deere Financial's execution petition seeking to enforce a Rs. 4,35,482 arbitral award dated 10-12-2021 against the judgment debtors. The court held that since the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed by the decree holder without mutual consent, the arbitration agreement violated principles of independence and impartiality, rendering the award void ab initio and unenforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M/S. John Deere Financial India Private Limited v. Sunil Kumar Singh The Principal District Judge dismissed John Deere Financial's execution petition seeking to enforce a Rs. 4,35,482 arbitral award dated 10-12-2021 against the judgment debtors. The court held that since the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed by the decree holder without mutual consent, the arbitration agreement violated principles of independence and impartiality, rendering the award void ab initio and unenforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Rohtas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case