Sugandhi Devi @ Sugandhi Pandey vs State of Bihar — 71/2021
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 399. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th April 2026.
CRI. REVISION - Criminal Revision
CNR: BRRO010038792021
Filing Number
3868/2021
Filing Date
04-Aug-2021
Registration No
71/2021
Registration Date
05-Aug-2021
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 07-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sugandhi Devi @ Sugandhi Pandey
Adv. Aviranjay Kumar Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
RejectedView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge rejected Sugandhi Devi's criminal revision challenging the trial court's order to issue summons against her in a complaint case. The court found the trial court's decision legal and judicious, noting that the complainant and three inquiry witnesses testified supporting the complaint, making the revisionist's arguments about lack of eyewitnesses and her alleged absence insufficient to warrant interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
29-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2025
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Oct-2024
Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Aug-2024
Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report
District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2024
Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report
District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-May-2024
Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report
District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Apr-2024
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2024
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Jan-2024
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
14-Dec-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Nov-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Jul-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Jun-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
19-May-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Jan-2023
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Oct-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Aug-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Jun-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
17-May-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Jan-2022
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Dec-2021
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2021
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2021
Hearing
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2021
Hearing
-
31-Aug-2021
Hearing
-
10-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2021
Summary The Sessions Judge rejected Sugandhi Devi's criminal revision challenging the trial court's order to issue summons against her in a complaint case. The court found the trial court's decision legal and judicious, noting that the complainant and three inquiry witnesses testified supporting the complaint, making the revisionist's arguments about lack of eyewitnesses and her alleged absence insufficient to warrant interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts