SHAMBHU BIND vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 588/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010026762026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
2426/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
588/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
8-District And Additional Sessions Judge-10
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
02
Police Station
SHIVSAGAR (BADDI)
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAMBHU BIND
Adv. Umesh Nath Dubey
-
2.ARUN BIND ARUN KUMAR
Adv. Umesh Nath Dubey
-
3.GUDDU BIND ALIAS GUDDU KUMAR
Adv. Umesh Nath Dubey
-
4.HEERAMUNI DEVI
Adv. Umesh Nath Dubey
-
5.PIARI DEVI ALIAS SAHODARI DEVI
Adv. Umesh Nath Dubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
allowedView PDF
Case Summary: 588/2026 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to all five petitioners (Shambhu Bind, Arun Bind, Guddu Bind, Hiramuni Devi, and Piyari Devi) in this case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(4), 117(2), 351(2), 352, 109, and 3(5). The court found that both parties had settled the dispute and reconciled, making bail appropriate under the circumstances. Key Condition: The petitioners were released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal value, and were directed to comply with all conditions under CrPC section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-10
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 588/2026
Case Summary: 588/2026 Court Decision: The District & Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to all five petitioners (Shambhu Bind, Arun Bind, Guddu Bind, Hiramuni Devi, and Piyari Devi) in this case involving charges under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(4), 117(2), 351(2), 352, 109, and 3(5). The court found that both parties had settled the dispute and reconciled, making bail appropriate under the circumstances. Key Condition: The petitioners were released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal value, and were directed to comply with all conditions under CrPC section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts