Rahul Kumar vs State of Bihar — 550/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.
A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010025562026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
2319/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
550/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
3-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-1
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
ROHTAS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rahul Kumar
Adv. Nityanand Pandey
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-1
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 550/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Rahul Kumar in a dowry prohibition and cruelty case filed by his wife. The judge found the allegations vague and noted a 20-month unexplained delay in filing the FIR, weak evidence (no medical reports for alleged forced abortion), and that both parties are well-educated professionals with no financial distress. The court permitted bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, viewing the case as a matrimonial dispute where reconciliation remains possible, and directed the trial court to monitor proceedings for potential settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 550/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Rahul Kumar in a dowry prohibition and cruelty case filed by his wife. The judge found the allegations vague and noted a 20-month unexplained delay in filing the FIR, weak evidence (no medical reports for alleged forced abortion), and that both parties are well-educated professionals with no financial distress. The court permitted bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, viewing the case as a matrimonial dispute where reconciliation remains possible, and directed the trial court to monitor proceedings for potential settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts