Lilawati Devi vs State of Bihar — 547/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.
A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010025192026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
2282/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
547/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
3-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-1
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
ROHTAS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lilawati Devi
Adv. Nityanand Pandey
Jeetendra Kumar
Adv. Nityanand Pandey
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Kajal Kumari
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-1
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-04-2026 | ORDER |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 547/2026 The court granted pre-arrest bail to petitioners Lilawati Devi and Jeetendra Kumar (mother-in-law and father-in-law), who were accused of dowry harassment and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. The judge found the allegations vague and lacking specific details, noting a 20-month delay between the victim leaving the matrimonial home and filing the FIR, suggesting manufactured charges arising from an underlying divorce dispute. The court released them on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, imposing a condition that they endeavour for amicable reconciliation between the estranged couple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 547/2026 The court granted pre-arrest bail to petitioners Lilawati Devi and Jeetendra Kumar (mother-in-law and father-in-law), who were accused of dowry harassment and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. The judge found the allegations vague and lacking specific details, noting a 20-month delay between the victim leaving the matrimonial home and filing the FIR, suggesting manufactured charges arising from an underlying divorce dispute. The court released them on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, imposing a condition that they endeavour for amicable reconciliation between the estranged couple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts