Bimlesh Singh vs State of Bihar — 231/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
Bail Petition - Regular Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010023052026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
2087/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
231/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
5-District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
472
Police Station
AKODHI GOLA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bimlesh Singh
Adv. Sunil Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
allowedView PDF
Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Rohtas granted bail to all six accused persons in a gang-related firearm case (Akorhigola P.S Case No. 472/2025). The court found serious procedural violations, notably that seized arms and ammunition were recovered in open sky without proper witness documentation as required under Section 103(4) of BNSS, and the case appeared to arise from a gang conflict with competing counter-FIRs filed by different parties. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
19-Mar-2026
Order
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 231/2026
Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Rohtas granted bail to all six accused persons in a gang-related firearm case (Akorhigola P.S Case No. 472/2025). The court found serious procedural violations, notably that seized arms and ammunition were recovered in open sky without proper witness documentation as required under Section 103(4) of BNSS, and the case appeared to arise from a gang conflict with competing counter-FIRs filed by different parties. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts