Bimlesh Singh vs State of Bihar — 231/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Bail Petition - Regular Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO010023052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

2087/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

231/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Rohtas

Judge

5-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-3

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

472

Police Station

AKODHI GOLA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,115(2),109,352,351(3)
ARMS ACT Section 25(1-b)a,26,35

Petitioner(s)

Bimlesh Singh

Adv. Sunil Singh

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-3

30-03-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

ORDER

17-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

28-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
allowed

Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Rohtas granted bail to all six accused persons in a gang-related firearm case (Akorhigola P.S Case No. 472/2025). The court found serious procedural violations, notably that seized arms and ammunition were recovered in open sky without proper witness documentation as required under Section 103(4) of BNSS, and the case appeared to arise from a gang conflict with competing counter-FIRs filed by different parties. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Judge at Rohtas granted bail to all six accused persons in a gang-related firearm case (Akorhigola P.S Case No. 472/2025). The court found serious procedural violations, notably that seized arms and ammunition were recovered in open sky without proper witness documentation as required under Section 103(4) of BNSS, and the case appeared to arise from a gang conflict with competing counter-FIRs filed by different parties. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Rohtas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case