Lal Bihari Sah vs State of Bihar — 497/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.
A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010022582026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
2045/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
497/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
BAGHELA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lal Bihari Sah
Adv. Rakesh Kumar
-
2.Pappu Sah
Adv. Rakesh Kumar
-
3.Anita Devi
Adv. Rakesh Kumar
-
4.Dhanmuni Devi
Adv. Rakesh Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
allowed
The court granted pre-arrest bail to the four petitioners (in-laws of the informant) charged under BNS 2023 sections related to alleged criminal intimidation and assault. The judge found exaggerations likely stemmed from deteriorating conjugal relations between the informant and her husband, and imposed bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, conditioning their release on efforts to reconcile the marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
13-May-2026
Order
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
16-Mar-2026
Daily Order
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 497/2026
The court granted pre-arrest bail to the four petitioners (in-laws of the informant) charged under BNS 2023 sections related to alleged criminal intimidation and assault. The judge found exaggerations likely stemmed from deteriorating conjugal relations between the informant and her husband, and imposed bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, conditioning their release on efforts to reconcile the marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts