Amit Kumar alias Ankit Ram vs State of Bihar — 468/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO010020752026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

1877/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

468/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Rohtas

Judge

5-District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

AKODHI GOLA

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,341,323,324,307,379,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amit Kumar alias Ankit Ram

    Adv. Shivani Riya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    allowed

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Amit Kumar in a land dispute case involving rioting and theft charges. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioner, noted that 37 co-accused had already been granted similar bail, and allowed the petition on furnishing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District And Additional Sessions Judge-3

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 468/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Amit Kumar in a land dispute case involving rioting and theft charges. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioner, noted that 37 co-accused had already been granted similar bail, and allowed the petition on furnishing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case