Arvind Singh vs Om Prakash Singh and others — 613/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341/323/448/504/307/506/427/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
SESSIONS CASE
CNR: BRRO010019002015
Filing Number
1368/2015
Filing Date
22-Sep-2015
Registration No
613/2015
Registration Date
22-Sep-2015
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
194
Police Station
KARGAHAR
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arvind Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Om Prakash Singh and others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
AcquittalView PDF
Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Om Prakash & Others Court Decision: All five accused persons (Om Prakash, Ramanuj Singh, Sheo Prakash @ Tunnu Singh, Usha Devi, and Sona Devi) were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 337/34, 341, 504, 307 and Arms Act section 27. Key Reasoning: The Sessions Judge found insufficient evidence to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. Critical prosecution witnesses contradicted themselves—the informant admitted darkness prevented identification, one injured witness stated his injury resulted from falling rather than assault, and another couldn't identify attackers due to crowd. Three witnesses were declared hostile, the medical witness had died, and material contradictions undermined case credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
31-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
14-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2021
Prosecution Evidence
-
07-Aug-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jul-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-May-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Jul-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jun-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2020
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Oct-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Sep-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jul-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-May-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Apr-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Jan-2019
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Apr-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2018
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Oct-2017
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Aug-2017
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jun-2017
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2017
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2017
Prosecution Evidence
District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
28-Nov-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
14-Sep-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
29-Jul-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
02-Jun-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
30-Mar-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
25-Feb-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
08-Jan-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
24-Nov-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Sep-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 613/2015
Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Om Prakash & Others Court Decision: All five accused persons (Om Prakash, Ramanuj Singh, Sheo Prakash @ Tunnu Singh, Usha Devi, and Sona Devi) were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 337/34, 341, 504, 307 and Arms Act section 27. Key Reasoning: The Sessions Judge found insufficient evidence to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt. Critical prosecution witnesses contradicted themselves—the informant admitted darkness prevented identification, one injured witness stated his injury resulted from falling rather than assault, and another couldn't identify attackers due to crowd. Three witnesses were declared hostile, the medical witness had died, and material contradictions undermined case credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts