Gyanti Devi vs State of Bihar — 47/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. REVISION - Criminal Revision

CNR: BRRO010017062024

Filing Number

1704/2024

Filing Date

27-Feb-2024

Registration No

47/2024

Registration Date

28-Feb-2024

Court

DJ Div. Rohtas

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gyanti Devi

    Adv. Suresh Tiwary

  2. 2.Sarita Devi

  3. 3.Ritik Kumari @ Kshigan Kumar

  4. 4.Sumitra Devi

  5. 5.Upendra Kumar

  6. 6.Narad Kumar

  7. 7.Ramlayak Singh

  8. 8.Ashok Kumar Mehta

  9. 9.Nitish Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    RejectedView PDF

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    RejectedView PDF

    The Sessions Judge rejected the criminal revision case filed by nine revisionists challenging an SDM order dated 15-09-2023 under Section 107 Cr.P.C., primarily due to the revisionists' complete non-prosecution and absence despite multiple opportunities. Additionally, the statutory one-year validity period for Section 107 Cr.P.C. orders had already expired, rendering the revision moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  8. 31-Oct-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  12. 05-May-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  13. 24-Feb-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  14. 08-Jan-2025

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  15. 21-Nov-2024

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  16. 22-Oct-2024

    Admission

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  17. 07-Sep-2024

    Admission

    District And Sessions Judge

  18. 17-Aug-2024

    Admission

    District And Sessions Judge

  19. 26-Jul-2024

    Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report

    District And Sessions Judge

  20. 24-Jun-2024

    Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report

    District And Sessions Judge

  21. 31-May-2024

    Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report

    District And Sessions Judge

  22. 03-May-2024

    Awaiting of Shrishtedar Report

    District And Sessions Judge

  23. 28-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    District And Sessions Judge

  24. 14-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 27-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the criminal revision case filed by nine revisionists challenging an SDM order dated 15-09-2023 under Section 107 Cr.P.C., primarily due to the revisionists' complete non-prosecution and absence despite multiple opportunities. Additionally, the statutory one-year validity period for Section 107 Cr.P.C. orders had already expired, rendering the revision moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case