HARSH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 102/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
Bail Petition - Regular Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010010352026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
930/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
102/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
488
Police Station
DEHRI (TOWN)
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARSH KUMAR
Adv. Prasoon Shankar
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
allowedView PDF
Case 102/2026 Summary: The court granted regular bail to 19-year-old Harsh Kumar, who was accused under BNS sections 137(2), 96, and 3(5) (kidnapping/abduction of a minor). The victim's own statement contradicted the FIR, confirming she voluntarily met the petitioner and returned on her own volition. Considering the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents, four months of incarceration, absence of witness tampering threats, and his youth, the court allowed bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount as a "warning chance." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
27-Feb-2026
Order
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
16-Feb-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
30-Jan-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2026
Case 102/2026 Summary: The court granted regular bail to 19-year-old Harsh Kumar, who was accused under BNS sections 137(2), 96, and 3(5) (kidnapping/abduction of a minor). The victim's own statement contradicted the FIR, confirming she voluntarily met the petitioner and returned on her own volition. Considering the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents, four months of incarceration, absence of witness tampering threats, and his youth, the court allowed bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount as a "warning chance." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts