State of Bihar vs Sunil Chaudhari — 73/2004
Case under Excise Act (Bihar) Section 47a. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Excise Act
CNR: BRRO010003842004
Filing Number
73/2004
Filing Date
12-Aug-2004
Registration No
73/2004
Registration Date
12-Aug-2004
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
4-Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Madya NiShedh/Excise
Year
2004
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunil Chaudhari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
AcquittalView PDF
Summary: The Exclusive Special Excise Court, Rohtas acquitted Sunil Chaudhary of charges under Section 47(a) of the Bihar Excise Act 1915 for illegal possession and sale of liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps: the seized liquor was never produced in court, the investigating officer was not examined, chemical examination reports were absent, and the only witness produced was declared hostile. Consequently, the accused was given the benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
05-Oct-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
08-Aug-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
19-Jun-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
25-Jan-2024
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
23-Nov-2023
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
26-Sep-2023
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
17-Aug-2023
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
07-Jul-2023
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
30-May-2023
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
18-Apr-2023
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
23-Jan-2023
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
04-Nov-2022
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
07-Sep-2022
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
28-Jul-2022
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
21-Jun-2022
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
10-May-2022
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
23-Mar-2022
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
07-Feb-2022
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
16-Dec-2021
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
25-Oct-2021
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
31-Aug-2021
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
17-Jul-2021
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
07-Jun-2021
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
20-Apr-2021
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
02-Mar-2021
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
18-Jan-2021
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
13-Nov-2020
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
06-Aug-2020
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
04-May-2020
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
07-Mar-2020
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
21-Jan-2020
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
18-Nov-2019
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
11-Sep-2019
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
16-Jul-2019
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
23-May-2019
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
09-Apr-2019
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
12-Dec-2018
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
18-Aug-2018
Report
Spl. Judge Excise Case.-01
-
29-Jun-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2004
Case filed
Registration No. 73/2004
Summary: The Exclusive Special Excise Court, Rohtas acquitted Sunil Chaudhary of charges under Section 47(a) of the Bihar Excise Act 1915 for illegal possession and sale of liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical evidentiary gaps: the seized liquor was never produced in court, the investigating officer was not examined, chemical examination reports were absent, and the only witness produced was declared hostile. Consequently, the accused was given the benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts