M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH MR PRABHAT KUMAR vs LAL BABU SHARMA — 2/2026
Case under Arbitration Act Section 36read,with2(C). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
EXECUITION CASES
CNR: BRRO010002292026
e-Filing Number
20-12-2025
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH MR PRABHAT KUMAR
Adv. SHASHI RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAL BABU SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
DismissedView PDF
Case Summary: Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. vs. Lal Babu Sharma Decision: The court dismissed the execution petition at the admission stage, holding that the arbitral award dated 28-03-2025 is unenforceable because it was passed by a sole arbitrator unilaterally appointed by the decree holder. Reasoning: The court found that the sole arbitrator (Mr. G. Dharmaraj) was appointed unilaterally by Cholamandalam, violating established Supreme Court precedents. The court determined that such unilateral appointment is void ab initio and does not inspire confidence in arbitrator independence and impartiality, making the resulting award without jurisdiction and non-est in law. Accordingly, the award directing payment of Rs. 14,58,335/- plus interest could not be enforced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2026
Case Summary: Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. vs. Lal Babu Sharma Decision: The court dismissed the execution petition at the admission stage, holding that the arbitral award dated 28-03-2025 is unenforceable because it was passed by a sole arbitrator unilaterally appointed by the decree holder. Reasoning: The court found that the sole arbitrator (Mr. G. Dharmaraj) was appointed unilaterally by Cholamandalam, violating established Supreme Court precedents. The court determined that such unilateral appointment is void ab initio and does not inspire confidence in arbitrator independence and impartiality, making the resulting award without jurisdiction and non-est in law. Accordingly, the award directing payment of Rs. 14,58,335/- plus interest could not be enforced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts