M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH MR PRABHAT KUMAR vs SUNIL KUMAR — 1/2026
Case under Arbitration Act Section 36read,with2(C). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
EXECUITION CASES
CNR: BRRO010002282026
e-Filing Number
20-12-2025
Filing Number
17/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH MR PRABHAT KUMAR
Adv. SHASHI RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUNIL KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
DismissedView PDF
Case Summary: Execution Case No. 01 of 2026 The Principal District Judge, Rohtas dismissed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's execution petition seeking to enforce an arbitral award of Rs. 12,57,579 against Sunil Kumar and Chandrawati Kumari. The court found that the award dated 25-07-2025 was passed by a sole arbitrator unilaterally appointed by the decree holder, which violated established Supreme Court precedents holding unilateral arbitrator appointments void ab initio and lacking confidence in independence and impartiality. Consequently, the arbitral award was deemed unenforceable and the execution case was dismissed at admission stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2026
Case Summary: Execution Case No. 01 of 2026 The Principal District Judge, Rohtas dismissed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company's execution petition seeking to enforce an arbitral award of Rs. 12,57,579 against Sunil Kumar and Chandrawati Kumari. The court found that the award dated 25-07-2025 was passed by a sole arbitrator unilaterally appointed by the decree holder, which violated established Supreme Court precedents holding unilateral arbitrator appointments void ab initio and lacking confidence in independence and impartiality. Consequently, the arbitral award was deemed unenforceable and the execution case was dismissed at admission stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts