SANJAY SETH vs RANJAN SETH AND OTHERS — 3471/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341/307/323/324/504/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.
SESSIONS CASE
CNR: BRRO010001332002
Filing Number
5205/2013
Filing Date
20-Jul-2002
Registration No
3471/2013
Registration Date
20-Jul-2002
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
5-District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 07-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY SETH
Respondent(s)
-
1.RANJAN SETH AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgement
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
07-Feb-2026
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
20-Jan-2026
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
15-Dec-2025
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
03-Dec-2025
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
26-Nov-2025
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
22-Nov-2025
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
12-Nov-2025
Arguments
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
11-Nov-2025
Appearance
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
13-Oct-2025
Appearance
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
03-Sep-2025
Appearance
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
12-Aug-2025
Appearance
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
05-Aug-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
23-Jul-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
25-Jun-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
06-Jun-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
22-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
18-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
-
16-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
26-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District And Additional Sessions Judge-3
-
03-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
30-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
06-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
26-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
31-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
01-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
01-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
29-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
10-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
24-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
09-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
13-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
14-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
18-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
13-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
19-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
27-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
29-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
19-Jan-2023
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
22-Dec-2022
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
19-Dec-2022
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-III
-
14-Nov-2022
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
03-Nov-2022
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
03-Nov-2022
Restored
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
03-Nov-2022
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
10-Mar-2021
Absconder
The 10th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rohtas declared accused Lalji Seth and Gopal Seth as absconders in criminal case CIS No. 3471/2013 after they repeatedly failed to appear despite court efforts, with evidence showing they reside in Punjab Ludhiana without property at their registered address. The court directed issuance of a permanent warrant against both accused in red ink. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2021
Disposed
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
04-Jan-2021
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
16-Oct-2020
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
29-Jul-2020
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
30-Jun-2020
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
23-May-2020
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
19-Mar-2020
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
24-Jan-2020
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
20-Nov-2019
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
23-Sep-2019
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
05-Aug-2019
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
18-Jun-2019
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
07-May-2019
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
01-Apr-2019
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
19-Feb-2019
Appearance
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
08-Jan-2019
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
27-Nov-2018
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
09-Oct-2018
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-X
-
18-Aug-2018
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
28-Jun-2018
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
14-May-2018
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
23-Mar-2018
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
28-Nov-2017
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
12-Sep-2017
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
21-Jul-2017
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
24-May-2017
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
15-Apr-2017
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
03-Feb-2017
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
19-Jan-2017
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-VII
-
10-Nov-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
13-Sep-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
11-Aug-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
18-Jul-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
13-Jun-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
20-Apr-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
18-Mar-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
17-Feb-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
14-Jan-2016
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
25-Nov-2015
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
14-Sep-2015
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
15-Jul-2015
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
13-May-2015
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
07-Apr-2015
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
11-Feb-2015
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
11-Dec-2014
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
31-Oct-2014
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
01-Sep-2014
Evidence
Additional District And Sessions Judge-V
-
06-Jun-2014
Evidence
Fast Track Court No-01
-
28-Mar-2014
Evidence
Fast Track Court No-01
-
02-Jan-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jul-2002
Case filed
Registration No. 3471/2013
The 10th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rohtas declared accused Lalji Seth and Gopal Seth as absconders in criminal case CIS No. 3471/2013 after they repeatedly failed to appear despite court efforts, with evidence showing they reside in Punjab Ludhiana without property at their registered address. The court directed issuance of a permanent warrant against both accused in red ink. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts