MD. NASHIM AND 7 OHTERS vs BABLOO AND 41 OTHERS — 189/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
Title Suit (SubJudge)
CNR: BRPU220000412014
Filing Number
189/2014
Filing Date
02-Jun-2014
Registration No
189/2014
Registration Date
02-Jun-2014
Court
Dhamdaha Civil Division
Judge
1-Subjudge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. NASHIM AND 7 OHTERS
Respondent(s)
-
1.BABLOO AND 41 OTHERS
-
2.OJRA KHATOON, W/o- LATE MD SAMSHAD
-
3.JENAB, D/o- LATE MD SAMSHAD
-
4.SEBI, D/o- LATE MD SAMSHAD
-
5.CHHOTI, D/o- LATE MD SAMSHAD
-
6.CHANDNI, D/o- LATE MD SAMSHAD
-
7.CHAND, S/o- LATE MD SAMSHAD
-
8.KASIF, S/o- LATE MD SAMSHAD
-
9.ASIF, S/o- LATE MD SAMSAD
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Issues
Subjudge
-
22-May-2026
Issues
Subjudge
-
16-Mar-2026
Issues
Subjudge
-
30-Jan-2026
Issues
Subjudge
-
03-Dec-2025
Issues
Subjudge
-
15-Sep-2025
Appearence
Subjudge
-
24-Jul-2025
Appearence
Subjudge
-
30-May-2025
Appearence
Subjudge
-
24-Apr-2025
Appearence
Subjudge
-
15-Apr-2025
Appearence
Subjudge
-
01-Feb-2025
Appearence
Subjudge
-
18-Jan-2025
Appearence
Subjudge
-
07-Dec-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
25-Oct-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
20-Sep-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
07-Aug-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
03-Jul-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
31-May-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
27-Apr-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
14-Mar-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
01-Feb-2024
Appearence
Subjudge
-
16-Dec-2023
Appearence
Subjudge
-
07-Nov-2023
Appearence
Subjudge
-
11-Oct-2023
Appearence
Subjudge
-
25-Sep-2023
Appearence
Subjudge
-
22-Aug-2023
Appearence
Subjudge
-
18-Jul-2023
Appearence
Subjudge
-
23-Jun-2023
Issues
Subjudge
-
23-May-2023
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
26-Apr-2023
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
11-Apr-2023
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
02-Mar-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Subjudge
-
31-Jan-2023
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Subjudge
-
23-Dec-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Subjudge
-
15-Nov-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Subjudge
-
13-Oct-2022
Settlement of Issues & Proceedings u/s 89crpc
Subjudge
-
12-Sep-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
16-Aug-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
21-Jul-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
08-Jul-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
22-Jun-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
07-Jun-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
02-Jun-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
23-May-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
21-May-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
29-Apr-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
07-Apr-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
11-Mar-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
19-Feb-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
17-Jan-2022
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
03-Dec-2021
Rejoinder
-
23-Oct-2021
Rejoinder
-
20-Sep-2021
Rejoinder
-
26-Jul-2021
Rejoinder
-
02-Jun-2021
Rejoinder
-
15-Apr-2021
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
03-Apr-2021
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
06-Mar-2021
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
11-Feb-2021
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
21-Jan-2021
Rejoinder
Subjudge
-
02-Jan-2021
Hearing
Subjudge
-
03-Nov-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
04-Sep-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
16-Jul-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
03-Jun-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
22-Apr-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
19-Mar-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
18-Feb-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
28-Jan-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
09-Jan-2020
Hearing
Subjudge
-
19-Dec-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
10-Dec-2019
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 189/2014 Outcome: The petition is disposed of with directions to parties. The court addressed a property dispute involving conflicting claims over land registered under Document No. 5844 (1962). The respondents claimed ownership based on ancestral rights and prior registered deeds, while the petitioners asserted claims based on subsequent transactions. The court found that the respondents' third and second wills established clear ownership and that the petitioners failed to substantiate their claims adequately. The court directed that if the respondents' disputed property is to be disturbed through an appeal under Civil Suit 332/96, proper legal procedures must be followed and the matter cannot be resolved unilaterally. The court emphasized that protection of disputed property and adherence to established legal procedures are mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Dec-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
26-Nov-2019
Order
Subjudge
-
23-Nov-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
22-Nov-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
15-Nov-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
07-Nov-2019
Order
Subjudge
-
18-Oct-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
15-Oct-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
04-Oct-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
01-Oct-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
19-Sep-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
28-Aug-2019
OrderView PDF
-
28-Aug-2019
further procedding
Subjudge
-
08-Aug-2019
Order
Subjudge
-
12-Jul-2019
Order
Subjudge
-
21-Jun-2019
Order
Subjudge
-
01-Jun-2019
Order
Subjudge
-
16-May-2019
Hearing
Subjudge
-
25-Apr-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
16-Mar-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
15-Feb-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
22-Jan-2019
Appearence
Subjudge
-
18-Dec-2018
Appearence
Subjudge
-
27-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jun-2014
Case filed
Registration No. 189/2014
Case Summary: 189/2014 Outcome: The petition is disposed of with directions to parties. The court addressed a property dispute involving conflicting claims over land registered under Document No. 5844 (1962). The respondents claimed ownership based on ancestral rights and prior registered deeds, while the petitioners asserted claims based on subsequent transactions. The court found that the respondents' third and second wills established clear ownership and that the petitioners failed to substantiate their claims adequately. The court directed that if the respondents' disputed property is to be disturbed through an appeal under Civil Suit 332/96, proper legal procedures must be followed and the matter cannot be resolved unilaterally. The court emphasized that protection of disputed property and adherence to established legal procedures are mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts