MD INSUL, S/o- LATE LAL MOHMMAD ANSARI vs MD SAMSUL ALAM AND 6 OTHERS — 113/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit (SubJudge)

CNR: BRPU220000342011

Filing Number

113/2011

Filing Date

16-Nov-2010

Registration No

113/2011

Registration Date

16-Nov-2010

Court

Dhamdaha Civil Division

Judge

1-Subjudge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD INSUL, S/o- LATE LAL MOHMMAD ANSARI

    Adv. NN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MD SAMSUL ALAM AND 6 OTHERS

  2. 2.AFROJA KHATOON, D/o- LATE ISHLAMUDDIN

  3. 3.SHAHNAJ BEGAM, D/o- LATE ISLAMUDDIN

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  6. 10-Nov-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  8. 23-Aug-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  9. 11-Jul-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  10. 29-May-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  11. 28-Mar-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  12. 20-Mar-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  13. 01-Feb-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  14. 18-Jan-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  15. 21-Nov-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  16. 30-Sep-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  17. 31-Aug-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  18. 19-Jun-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  19. 30-Apr-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  20. 20-Mar-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  21. 12-Feb-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  22. 08-Jan-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  23. 12-Dec-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  24. 02-Dec-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  25. 04-Nov-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  26. 10-Oct-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  27. 19-Sep-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  28. 17-Aug-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  29. 18-Jul-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  30. 21-Jun-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  31. 08-Jun-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  32. 23-May-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  33. 18-Apr-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  34. 31-Mar-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  35. 02-Mar-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  36. 17-Feb-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  37. 31-Jan-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  38. 06-Jan-2023

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  39. 14-Dec-2022

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  40. 03-Dec-2022

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  41. 09-Nov-2022

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  42. 22-Oct-2022

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  43. 29-Sep-2022

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  44. 29-Aug-2022

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  45. 16-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  46. 21-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  47. 06-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  48. 13-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  49. 21-May-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  50. 28-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  51. 11-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  52. 25-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  53. 02-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  54. 08-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  55. 03-Jan-2022

    Hearing

  56. 02-Nov-2021

    Hearing

  57. 26-Aug-2021

    Hearing

  58. 01-Jul-2021

    Hearing

  59. 06-May-2021

    Hearing

  60. 13-Apr-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  61. 20-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  62. 25-Feb-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  63. 27-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  64. 08-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  65. 01-Oct-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  66. 14-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  67. 26-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  68. 13-May-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  69. 04-Apr-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  70. 07-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  71. 11-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  72. 21-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  73. 23-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  74. 07-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  75. 18-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  76. 08-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  77. 23-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  78. 13-Sep-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  79. 16-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  80. 22-Jul-2019

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: T.S. No. 113/2011 The Sub-Judge, Dhamdaha dismissed the plaintiff's injunction petition dated 11/04/17. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants 3rd and 5th parties from interfering with his peaceful possession of jointly-owned schedule A land and to void sale deed no. 183 dated 08/01/2007 transferring schedule B land. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience favoring him, noting that defendants 5th party (schedule B purchasers) have valid rights as bona fide purchasers. The case is put up for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  81. 22-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  82. 01-Jul-2019

    Order

    Subjudge

  83. 22-Jun-2019

    Order

    Subjudge

  84. 11-Jun-2019

    Order

    Subjudge

  85. 24-May-2019

    Order

    Subjudge

  86. 21-May-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  87. 06-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  88. 01-Mar-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  89. 28-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  90. 22-Dec-2018

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  91. 19-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  92. 16-Nov-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 113/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: T.S. No. 113/2011 The Sub-Judge, Dhamdaha dismissed the plaintiff's injunction petition dated 11/04/17. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants 3rd and 5th parties from interfering with his peaceful possession of jointly-owned schedule A land and to void sale deed no. 183 dated 08/01/2007 transferring schedule B land. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience favoring him, noting that defendants 5th party (schedule B purchasers) have valid rights as bona fide purchasers. The case is put up for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case