MD INSUL, S/o- LATE LAL MOHMMAD ANSARI vs MD SAMSUL ALAM AND 6 OTHERS — 113/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Title Suit (SubJudge)

CNR: BRPU220000342011

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

Filing Number

113/2011

Filing Date

16-11-2010

Registration No

113/2011

Registration Date

16-11-2010

Court

Dhamdaha Civil Division

Judge

1-Subjudge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

MD INSUL, S/o- LATE LAL MOHMMAD ANSARI

Adv. NN

Respondent(s)

MD SAMSUL ALAM AND 6 OTHERS

AFROJA KHATOON, D/o- LATE ISHLAMUDDIN

SHAHNAJ BEGAM, D/o- LATE ISLAMUDDIN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subjudge

07-04-2026

EVIDENCE

16-03-2026

EVIDENCE

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE

19-12-2025

REJOINDER

10-11-2025

REJOINDER

Interim Orders

22-07-2019
Order

Case Summary: T.S. No. 113/2011 The Sub-Judge, Dhamdaha dismissed the plaintiff's injunction petition dated 11/04/17. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants 3rd and 5th parties from interfering with his peaceful possession of jointly-owned schedule A land and to void sale deed no. 183 dated 08/01/2007 transferring schedule B land. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience favoring him, noting that defendants 5th party (schedule B purchasers) have valid rights as bona fide purchasers. The case is put up for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: T.S. No. 113/2011 The Sub-Judge, Dhamdaha dismissed the plaintiff's injunction petition dated 11/04/17. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants 3rd and 5th parties from interfering with his peaceful possession of jointly-owned schedule A land and to void sale deed no. 183 dated 08/01/2007 transferring schedule B land. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience favoring him, noting that defendants 5th party (schedule B purchasers) have valid rights as bona fide purchasers. The case is put up for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Dhamdaha Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case