OM PRAKSH BHAGAT vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR PURNEA — 92/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRPU120000142012
Filing Number
92/2012
Filing Date
24-Mar-2012
Registration No
92/2012
Registration Date
24-Mar-2012
Court
Banmankhi Civil Division
Judge
1-Subjudge
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.OM PRAKSH BHAGAT
Adv. NA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH COLLECTOR PURNEA
Case History
-
15-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Subjudge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Subjudge
-
03-Feb-2026
Order
Subjudge
-
21-Jan-2026
Order
Subjudge
-
09-Jan-2026
Order
Subjudge
-
19-Dec-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
03-Dec-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
19-Nov-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
07-Nov-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
30-Oct-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
17-Sep-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
02-Sep-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
07-Aug-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
19-Jul-2025
Steps
Subjudge
-
27-Jun-2025
Steps
Subjudge
-
11-Jun-2025
Steps
Subjudge
-
27-May-2025
Steps
Subjudge
-
16-May-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The court ordered that two necessary parties (Jai Prakash Bhagat and Shiv Prakash Bhagat), who were omitted from the original suit regarding disputed land inheritance, be added as plaintiffs No. 3 and 4 to ensure effective and just resolution of the case. The case was adjourned to 27-05-25 for defendant's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2025
Steps
Subjudge
-
17-Apr-2025
Order
Subjudge
-
05-Apr-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
11-Mar-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
20-Feb-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
06-Feb-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
23-Jan-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
13-Jan-2025
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
24-Dec-2024
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
12-Dec-2024
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
13-Nov-2024
Evicence of defendent / Op
Subjudge
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
28-Aug-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
19-Jun-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
04-Jun-2024
OrderView PDF
-
04-Jun-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
16-May-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
03-May-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
19-Apr-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
28-Feb-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
Subjudge
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
07-Dec-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
08-Nov-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
20-Sep-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
07-Aug-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
28-Jun-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
19-May-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
06-Apr-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
22-Feb-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
13-Jan-2023
Evidence
Subjudge
-
02-Dec-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
03-Nov-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
22-Sep-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
02-Sep-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
22-Aug-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
28-Jul-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
30-Jun-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
16-Jun-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
08-Jun-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
07-May-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
02-Apr-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
25-Feb-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
21-Jan-2022
Evidence
Subjudge
-
17-Dec-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
01-Nov-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
15-Sep-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
13-Aug-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
17-Jul-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
21-Jun-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
24-May-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
23-Apr-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
23-Mar-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
24-Feb-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
29-Jan-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
05-Jan-2021
Evidence
Subjudge
-
03-Dec-2020
Evidence
Subjudge
-
31-Oct-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
24-Sep-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
31-Aug-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
31-Jul-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
07-Jul-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
12-Jun-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
18-May-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
21-Apr-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
25-Mar-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
04-Mar-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
19-Feb-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
06-Feb-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
24-Jan-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
13-Jan-2020
Issues
Subjudge
-
12-Dec-2019
Issues
Subjudge
-
28-Nov-2019
Issues
Subjudge
-
13-Nov-2019
Issues
Subjudge
-
17-Oct-2019
Issues
Subjudge
-
16-Oct-2019
Issues
Subjudge
-
19-Sep-2019
Issues
Subjudge
-
04-Sep-2019
Issues
Subjudge
-
21-Aug-2019
Order
Subjudge
-
08-Aug-2019
Compromise
Subjudge
-
06-Aug-2019
Compromise
Subjudge
-
25-Jul-2019
Compromise
Subjudge
-
20-Jul-2019
Written Statement
Subjudge
-
04-Jul-2019
Written Statement
Subjudge
-
18-Jun-2019
Written Statement
Subjudge
-
29-May-2019
Written Statement
Subjudge
-
15-May-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2012
Case Summary The court ordered that two necessary parties (Jai Prakash Bhagat and Shiv Prakash Bhagat), who were omitted from the original suit regarding disputed land inheritance, be added as plaintiffs No. 3 and 4 to ensure effective and just resolution of the case. The case was adjourned to 27-05-25 for defendant's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts