RAMCHANDRA MAHTO vs UGIYA DEVI — 170/2013

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 27-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: BRPU120000082013

Filing Number

170/2013

Filing Date

14-Jun-2013

Registration No

170/2013

Registration Date

14-Jun-2013

Court

Banmankhi Civil Division

Judge

1-Subjudge

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMCHANDRA MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UGIYA DEVI

Case History

  1. 27-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-May-2026

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Subjudge

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Subjudge

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Subjudge

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Eviddence of Plaintiff / Petitioner

    Subjudge

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Subjudge

  11. 17-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Subjudge

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  15. 15-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  16. 21-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  17. 09-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  18. 16-May-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  19. 16-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 170/2013 - RAMCHANDRA MAHTO v. UGIYA DEVI The petitioner's application dated 14-08-24 seeking amendment to the plaint was dismissed as unclear and lacking specificity. The petitioner failed to specify which clause of the plaint required amendment, rendering the application devoid of merit. The case was adjourned to 16-05-25 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 16-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  21. 09-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  22. 21-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  23. 28-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  24. 05-Feb-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  25. 06-Jan-2025

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  26. 22-Nov-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  27. 05-Oct-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  28. 21-Sep-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  29. 30-Aug-2024

    Rejoinder

    Subjudge

  30. 14-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  31. 25-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  32. 04-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  33. 27-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  34. 07-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  35. 17-May-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  36. 24-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  37. 23-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  38. 07-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  39. 13-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  40. 09-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  41. 04-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  42. 08-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  43. 20-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  44. 07-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  45. 28-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  46. 19-May-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  47. 06-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  48. 22-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  49. 13-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  50. 02-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  51. 03-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  52. 30-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  53. 06-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  54. 18-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  55. 03-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  56. 12-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  57. 11-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  58. 07-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  59. 06-May-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  60. 01-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  61. 24-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  62. 20-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  63. 16-Dec-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  64. 20-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  65. 23-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  66. 24-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  67. 27-Jul-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  68. 30-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  69. 03-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  70. 03-May-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  71. 05-Apr-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  72. 05-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  73. 06-Feb-2021

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  74. 13-Jan-2021

    Order

    Subjudge

  75. 10-Dec-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  76. 09-Nov-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  77. 05-Oct-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  78. 09-Sep-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  79. 14-Aug-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  80. 16-Jul-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  81. 22-Jun-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  82. 28-May-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  83. 02-May-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  84. 07-Apr-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  85. 20-Mar-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  86. 27-Feb-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  87. 21-Jan-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  88. 07-Jan-2020

    Order

    Subjudge

  89. 17-Dec-2019

    Order

    Subjudge

  90. 26-Nov-2019

    Order

    Subjudge

  91. 06-Nov-2019

    Order

    Subjudge

  92. 24-Oct-2019

    Order

    Subjudge

  93. 04-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  94. 24-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  95. 09-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  96. 26-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  97. 14-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  98. 01-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  99. 20-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  100. 04-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Subjudge

  101. 18-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  102. 10-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  103. 27-May-2019

    Hearing

    Subjudge

  104. 17-May-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  105. 14-Jun-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 170/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 170/2013 - RAMCHANDRA MAHTO v. UGIYA DEVI The petitioner's application dated 14-08-24 seeking amendment to the plaint was dismissed as unclear and lacking specificity. The petitioner failed to specify which clause of the plaint required amendment, rendering the application devoid of merit. The case was adjourned to 16-05-25 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case