Dinesh Mandal vs Parmanand Mandal — 4434/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,447/34. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
G.R.Police Cases - G.R.Police Cases-165
CNR: BRPU110001292018
Filing Number
4434/2018
Filing Date
11-Feb-2025
Registration No
4434/2018
Registration Date
15-Dec-2018
Court
Banmankhi CJM Division
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
263
Police Station
BANMANKHI
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dinesh Mandal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parmanand Mandal
-
2.Vipin Mandal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court dismissed Dinesh Mandal's petition filed before the High Court of Punjab, finding no merit in his challenge to the State Public Lok Adalat's decision. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate grounds for interference and that the national lok adalat's award cannot be overturned without substantial evidence of jurisdictional error or procedural defect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
03-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate 1st Calss
-
02-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4434/2018
The court dismissed Dinesh Mandal's petition filed before the High Court of Punjab, finding no merit in his challenge to the State Public Lok Adalat's decision. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate grounds for interference and that the national lok adalat's award cannot be overturned without substantial evidence of jurisdictional error or procedural defect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts