Nandan Kumar Suman vs Urmila Devi — 6136/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,448,504,506/34. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

G.R.Police Cases - G.R.Police Cases-165

CNR: BRPU110000382022

Filing Number

6136/2022

Filing Date

06-Dec-2022

Registration No

6136/2022

Registration Date

06-Dec-2022

Court

Banmankhi CJM Division

Judge

1-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

428

Police Station

BANMANKHI

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,448,504,506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nandan Kumar Suman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Urmila Devi

  2. 2.Vipin Kumar

  3. 3.Ajeet Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by Nandan Kumar Suman, finding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for the case and that the respondents (Urmila Devi, Vipin Kumar, and Ajeet Kumar) had submitted a written response denying the allegations. The court concluded there was no valid cause of action and directed the case to be closed in accordance with procedural regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  10. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  11. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  12. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  13. 13-May-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  14. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  15. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  16. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  17. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  18. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  19. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  20. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  21. 22-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  22. 07-Jun-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  23. 22-May-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  24. 30-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  25. 05-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  26. 12-Mar-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  27. 17-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate -I

  28. 22-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 06-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6136/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by Nandan Kumar Suman, finding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for the case and that the respondents (Urmila Devi, Vipin Kumar, and Ajeet Kumar) had submitted a written response denying the allegations. The court concluded there was no valid cause of action and directed the case to be closed in accordance with procedural regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case