ABDUL WAHID vs STATE OF BIHAR — 171/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,126,2,118,1,109,351,2,352,3,5. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRPU010089052025

Filing Number

7955/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

171/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

JALALGARH

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,126,2,118,1,109,351,2,352,3,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL WAHID

    Adv. PRABHAT KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

  2. 2.SHAKUR

  3. 3.SOHIB

  4. 4.KASHIRA

  5. 5.AASMA

  6. 6.SAHJADIN

  7. 7.BEGAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed Abdul Wahid's criminal revision against the lower court's cognizance order, affirming that the Magistrate properly took cognizance under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352, and 351(2) against the accused. The court found insufficient evidence for the additional charges under BNS sections 118(2) and 109 (attempt to murder), as the injuries were simple/non-vital, there was no repetition of blows, and the incident arose from a land dispute rather than any intent to kill, lacking the essential mens rea required for these grave offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed Abdul Wahid's criminal revision against the lower court's cognizance order, affirming that the Magistrate properly took cognizance under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 352, and 351(2) against the accused. The court found insufficient evidence for the additional charges under BNS sections 118(2) and 109 (attempt to murder), as the injuries were simple/non-vital, there was no repetition of blows, and the incident arose from a land dispute rather than any intent to kill, lacking the essential mens rea required for these grave offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case