BHAGWAN SAH vs STATE OF BIHAR — 161/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191,109,115,303,305,333,74,75,76,310. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRPU010082992025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7401/2025
Filing Date
03-12-2025
Registration No
161/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAGWAN SAH
Adv. SHANKAR KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
RAJ KUMAR SAH, MUSHARU SAH
RAJ NANADAN KUMAR, RAVI
BHARAT KUMAR
MURLI KUMAR
BINDESHWARI SAH
GULSHAN KUMAR
RAJENDRA SAH
BIPIN KUMAR
ABHISHEKH KUMAR
MITHILESH SAH
KHANTAR KUMAR
DILKHUSH KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 22-01-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-01-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision and set aside the Magistrate's order, directing it to be reconsidered. The court found that the lower court failed to properly evaluate evidence—including witness statements and medical reports documenting ligature marks on victims' necks—that established a prima facie case for serious offences including attempted murder under BNS Section 109, not merely the lesser charges the Magistrate had summed on. The judge emphasized that at the cognizance stage, only prima facie case sufficiency need be assessed, not merit evaluation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision and set aside the Magistrate's order, directing it to be reconsidered. The court found that the lower court failed to properly evaluate evidence—including witness statements and medical reports documenting ligature marks on victims' necks—that established a prima facie case for serious offences including attempted murder under BNS Section 109, not merely the lesser charges the Magistrate had summed on. The judge emphasized that at the cognizance stage, only prima facie case sufficiency need be assessed, not merit evaluation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts