BHAGWAN SAH vs STATE OF BIHAR — 161/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191,109,115,303,305,333,74,75,76,310. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRPU010082992025

Filing Number

7401/2025

Filing Date

03-Dec-2025

Registration No

161/2025

Registration Date

03-Dec-2025

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191,109,115,303,305,333,74,75,76,310
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAGWAN SAH

    Adv. SHANKAR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

  2. 2.RAJ KUMAR SAH, MUSHARU SAH

  3. 3.RAJ NANADAN KUMAR, RAVI

  4. 4.BHARAT KUMAR

  5. 5.MURLI KUMAR

  6. 6.BINDESHWARI SAH

  7. 7.GULSHAN KUMAR

  8. 8.RAJENDRA SAH

  9. 9.BIPIN KUMAR

  10. 10.ABHISHEKH KUMAR

  11. 11.MITHILESH SAH

  12. 12.KHANTAR KUMAR

  13. 13.DILKHUSH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision and set aside the Magistrate's order, directing it to be reconsidered. The court found that the lower court failed to properly evaluate evidence—including witness statements and medical reports documenting ligature marks on victims' necks—that established a prima facie case for serious offences including attempted murder under BNS Section 109, not merely the lesser charges the Magistrate had summed on. The judge emphasized that at the cognizance stage, only prima facie case sufficiency need be assessed, not merit evaluation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision and set aside the Magistrate's order, directing it to be reconsidered. The court found that the lower court failed to properly evaluate evidence—including witness statements and medical reports documenting ligature marks on victims' necks—that established a prima facie case for serious offences including attempted murder under BNS Section 109, not merely the lesser charges the Magistrate had summed on. The judge emphasized that at the cognizance stage, only prima facie case sufficiency need be assessed, not merit evaluation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case