BHAGWAN SAH vs STATE OF BIHAR — 161/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191,109,115,303,305,333,74,75,76,310. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRPU010082992025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

7401/2025

Filing Date

03-12-2025

Registration No

161/2025

Registration Date

03-12-2025

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191,109,115,303,305,333,74,75,76,310
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

BHAGWAN SAH

Adv. SHANKAR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

RAJ KUMAR SAH, MUSHARU SAH

RAJ NANADAN KUMAR, RAVI

BHARAT KUMAR

MURLI KUMAR

BINDESHWARI SAH

GULSHAN KUMAR

RAJENDRA SAH

BIPIN KUMAR

ABHISHEKH KUMAR

MITHILESH SAH

KHANTAR KUMAR

DILKHUSH KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

07-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

ORDER

12-02-2026

HEARING

22-01-2026

HEARING

06-01-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision and set aside the Magistrate's order, directing it to be reconsidered. The court found that the lower court failed to properly evaluate evidence—including witness statements and medical reports documenting ligature marks on victims' necks—that established a prima facie case for serious offences including attempted murder under BNS Section 109, not merely the lesser charges the Magistrate had summed on. The judge emphasized that at the cognizance stage, only prima facie case sufficiency need be assessed, not merit evaluation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge allowed the criminal revision and set aside the Magistrate's order, directing it to be reconsidered. The court found that the lower court failed to properly evaluate evidence—including witness statements and medical reports documenting ligature marks on victims' necks—that established a prima facie case for serious offences including attempted murder under BNS Section 109, not merely the lesser charges the Magistrate had summed on. The judge emphasized that at the cognizance stage, only prima facie case sufficiency need be assessed, not merit evaluation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Purnea All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case