RAJENDRA PRASAD SAH vs STATE OF BIHAR — 133/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 127,1,76,308,3,352,351,3,5. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.
Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRPU010069402025
Filing Number
6171/2025
Filing Date
27-Sep-2025
Registration No
133/2025
Registration Date
27-Sep-2025
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
257
Police Station
BAISI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJENDRA PRASAD SAH
Adv. SUJIT KUMAR
-
2.SARVESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
-
2.PRAKASH CHANDRA SAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Revision 133/2025 Court Decision: The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Rajendra Prasad Sah and Sarvesh Kumar, upholding the Magistrate's June 4, 2025 cognizance order that found prima facie evidence against them under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). Key Reasoning: The court held that at the cognizance stage, a Magistrate need only find sufficient ground to proceed—not sufficient ground for conviction. The allegations involved assault with weapons and attempted outrage of modesty on September 3, 2024. The court found adequate prima facie evidence in the case diary and rejected the petitioners' arguments that multiple parallel FIRs justified dismissal, noting the occurrences were on different dates. The revision was dismissed as the impugned order was legally sound with no irregularity or illegality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 133/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Revision 133/2025 Court Decision: The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Rajendra Prasad Sah and Sarvesh Kumar, upholding the Magistrate's June 4, 2025 cognizance order that found prima facie evidence against them under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). Key Reasoning: The court held that at the cognizance stage, a Magistrate need only find sufficient ground to proceed—not sufficient ground for conviction. The allegations involved assault with weapons and attempted outrage of modesty on September 3, 2024. The court found adequate prima facie evidence in the case diary and rejected the petitioners' arguments that multiple parallel FIRs justified dismissal, noting the occurrences were on different dates. The revision was dismissed as the impugned order was legally sound with no irregularity or illegality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts