RAJENDRA YADAV vs STATE OF BIHAR — 72/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,447,341,323,324,379,504,327,506. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRPU010036982025

Filing Number

3293/2025

Filing Date

29-May-2025

Registration No

72/2025

Registration Date

29-May-2025

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

4-2nd Dasj

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

222

Police Station

SARSI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,447,341,323,324,379,504,327,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA YADAV

    Adv. MANOJ KUMAR

  2. 2.SANJAY YADAV, SANJAY KUMAR YADAV

  3. 3.RAJA YADAV

  4. 4.AMRIT YADAV

  5. 5.AMIT KUMAR YADAV

  6. 6.KARO YADAV, SURAJ KUMAR

  7. 7.SUMIT KUMAR YADAV

  8. 8.PRAVEEN KUMAR

  9. 9.GAURAV KUMAR YADAV

  10. 10.GOLU KUMAR, GOVIND KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

  2. 2.MANOJ YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Revision No. 72/2025 The District and Additional Sessions Judge II, Purnea dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Rajendra Yadav and others challenging the magistrate's cognizance order dated 18.04.2024. The petitioners argued the order was arbitrary and mechanically passed, claiming one petitioner was on duty elsewhere, some petitioners were juveniles unsupported by witness testimony, and the informant was a biased relative with vested interest in the disputed land. The court dismissed the revision permitting the petitioners to file a fresh, properly drafted petition, as the counsel sought withdrawal citing legal mistakes in the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Dasj

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  12. 13-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  13. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  15. 30-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 29-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Revision No. 72/2025 The District and Additional Sessions Judge II, Purnea dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Rajendra Yadav and others challenging the magistrate's cognizance order dated 18.04.2024. The petitioners argued the order was arbitrary and mechanically passed, claiming one petitioner was on duty elsewhere, some petitioners were juveniles unsupported by witness testimony, and the informant was a biased relative with vested interest in the disputed land. The court dismissed the revision permitting the petitioners to file a fresh, properly drafted petition, as the counsel sought withdrawal citing legal mistakes in the original petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case