NITIN KUMAR SINGH vs STATE — 457/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20,B,ii,C. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010025722026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

2404/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

457/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

BAISI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8,20,B,ii,C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. RAHUL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Purnea rejected Nitin Kumar Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a drug trafficking case (NDPS Act §8/20(b)(ii)(C)). Singh, the owner of a vehicle hired to two men, argued he had no connection to 50.060 kg of ganja recovered during a police search, but the court found his lack of supporting documentation and ongoing investigation insufficient grounds for bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 457/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Purnea rejected Nitin Kumar Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a drug trafficking case (NDPS Act §8/20(b)(ii)(C)). Singh, the owner of a vehicle hired to two men, argued he had no connection to 50.060 kg of ganja recovered during a police search, but the court found his lack of supporting documentation and ongoing investigation insufficient grounds for bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case