SYEH HAMID vs STATE — 451/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPU010025522026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
2385/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
451/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
7-3rd Dasj
Decision Date
18-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
BAISI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SYEH HAMID
Adv. Hira Lal Sah
-
2.SAIYAD PERWEZ ALAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 451/2026 Court Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Seyad Hamid and Seyad Parvez Alam in connection with FIR 86/2026 under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found the charges were motivated by rural political rivalry and the petitioners' involvement was not substantiated by the FIR allegations; they were summoned by phone rather than present at the incident. Conditions: The bail was conditional on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal value and adherence to bail conditions, with the petitioners to surrender before the trial court within 15 days or face arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
Disposed
3rd Dasj
-
15-May-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
13-May-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
08-May-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
06-May-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
29-Apr-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Dasj
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 451/2026
Case Summary: 451/2026 Court Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Seyad Hamid and Seyad Parvez Alam in connection with FIR 86/2026 under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The court found the charges were motivated by rural political rivalry and the petitioners' involvement was not substantiated by the FIR allegations; they were summoned by phone rather than present at the incident. Conditions: The bail was conditional on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal value and adherence to bail conditions, with the petitioners to surrender before the trial court within 15 days or face arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts