SHANKAR YADAV ALIES SHANKAR KUMR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 449/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3)190,126(2),115(2),352,,351(2),305,61(2),318(4),333,118(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPU010025472026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
2381/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
449/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
84-10th Dasj
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
BANMANKHI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANKAR YADAV ALIES SHANKAR KUMR
Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR KARN
-
2.SHASHI LATA DEVI
-
3.SATHU KUMAR, PRINCE BADAL
-
4.KAILU YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners in a land dispute case involving allegations of conspiracy to sell government land, assault, and theft. The judge found the prosecution's case weak due to witness statements denying key allegations (theft, cloth-tearing, threats), lack of injury reports, absence of specific role attribution to accused, 12-year delay between land sale and FIR, and the underlying nature as a civil land dispute. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, conditional on cooperation with investigation and good behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
10th Dasj
-
30-Apr-2026
Hearing
10th Dasj
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing
10th Dasj
-
18-Apr-2026
Hearing
10th Dasj
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
10th Dasj
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
10th Dasj
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
10th Dasj
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
10th Dasj
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
10th Dasj
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 449/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to the four petitioners in a land dispute case involving allegations of conspiracy to sell government land, assault, and theft. The judge found the prosecution's case weak due to witness statements denying key allegations (theft, cloth-tearing, threats), lack of injury reports, absence of specific role attribution to accused, 12-year delay between land sale and FIR, and the underlying nature as a civil land dispute. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, conditional on cooperation with investigation and good behavior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts