AASIYA KHATOON vs STATE OF BIHAR — 22/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 109. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Mislaneous

CNR: BRPU010025242026

Filing Number

2358/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 109

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AASIYA KHATOON

    Adv. md ziyauddin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Aasiya Khatoon v. State of Bihar (Cr. Misc. 22/2026) The court granted Aasiya Khatoon's petition to extend her surrender period by 10 days from the order date. Khatoon had been granted anticipatory bail on 27.01.2026 in an electricity theft case but failed to deposit 50% of outstanding dues (Rs. 26,032.50) with the electricity department within the stipulated fortnight due to financial constraints, preventing bail bond furnishing. The court found her grounds convincing and extended the deadline while maintaining original bail conditions, additionally directing a Rs. 500 deposit to the Advocates' Welfare Fund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Aasiya Khatoon v. State of Bihar (Cr. Misc. 22/2026) The court granted Aasiya Khatoon's petition to extend her surrender period by 10 days from the order date. Khatoon had been granted anticipatory bail on 27.01.2026 in an electricity theft case but failed to deposit 50% of outstanding dues (Rs. 26,032.50) with the electricity department within the stipulated fortnight due to financial constraints, preventing bail bond furnishing. The court found her grounds convincing and extended the deadline while maintaining original bail conditions, additionally directing a Rs. 500 deposit to the Advocates' Welfare Fund. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case