MD JAVER, MD JAVED vs STATE OF BIHAR — 447/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304,317,2. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010025022026

Filing Number

2336/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

447/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

7-3rd Dasj

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

KHAJANCHI HAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304,317,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD JAVER, MD JAVED

    Adv. ANJAN KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 447/2026 The court rejected the bail application of MD JAVER, MD JAVED, and MD JAVED AALAM in a criminal case registered under Sections 304 and 317(2) BNS at Ke Haat Police Station. The applicants were accused of snatching a mobile phone from a police informant while riding a motorcycle on 18.02.2026. Although the applicants' counsel argued that the charges were fabricated and no offense was committed, the court found the allegations serious and the applicants' direct involvement evident, thereby dismissing the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Dasj

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Dasj

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Dasj

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Dasj

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 447/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 447/2026 The court rejected the bail application of MD JAVER, MD JAVED, and MD JAVED AALAM in a criminal case registered under Sections 304 and 317(2) BNS at Ke Haat Police Station. The applicants were accused of snatching a mobile phone from a police informant while riding a motorcycle on 18.02.2026. Although the applicants' counsel argued that the charges were fabricated and no offense was committed, the court found the allegations serious and the applicants' direct involvement evident, thereby dismissing the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case