RAM CHANDRA SAH AND OTHERS vs STATE — 441/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010024642026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

2299/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

441/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

4-2nd Dasj

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

208

Police Station

JANKI NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM CHANDRA SAH AND OTHERS

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR SAH

  2. 2.BIKAS SAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to Ram Chandra Sah (56) and Bikas Sah (22) in a case involving assault allegations arising from a land dispute. The judge found that injuries were mostly simple in nature with one non-vital grievous injury, both parties were blood relatives with mutual enmity, and a counter-case existed, warranting bail on Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Dasj

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 441/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Ram Chandra Sah (56) and Bikas Sah (22) in a case involving assault allegations arising from a land dispute. The judge found that injuries were mostly simple in nature with one non-vital grievous injury, both parties were blood relatives with mutual enmity, and a counter-case existed, warranting bail on Rs. 20,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case