MR VIKAS JAIN AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 433/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316,314,318,336,338,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010024252026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

2262/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

433/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

4-2nd Dasj

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

66

Police Station

KHAJANCHI HAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316,314,318,336,338,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR VIKAS JAIN AND OTHERS

    Adv. SUMIT KUMAR SUMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 433/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Mr. Vikas Jain and Praveen Kumar Jain in a fraud case involving alleged dishonest inducement to obtain ₹3,02,56,857 through forged documents and false promises to supply ductile iron pipes. The court found the dispute to be primarily civil in nature, noting the complainant submitted written no-objection before court, and ordered bail on a ₹20,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to the petitioners' cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Dasj

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 433/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to Mr. Vikas Jain and Praveen Kumar Jain in a fraud case involving alleged dishonest inducement to obtain ₹3,02,56,857 through forged documents and false promises to supply ductile iron pipes. The court found the dispute to be primarily civil in nature, noting the complainant submitted written no-objection before court, and ordered bail on a ₹20,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to the petitioners' cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case